We offer a large library of Programs specifically tailored to your goals and preferences. Our strength and conditioning programs are either designed for maximal strength development in the squat, bench press, deadlift, and overhead process, or for other themes of strength & conditioning.
You will find below each of our strength training programs below organized by focus areas. Click to see which best meets your goals and preferences or take our Program Quiz to get specific recommendations.
Need help deciding on a program? Use our Program Quiz:
“I’m wrapping up my second round of the Hypertrophy 1 template. It was awesome – After the first round, my big 3 went up 20lbs each! I haven’t tested for the second round yet, I’m sure there will be more gains there.” –Spinneret
“After some awesome progress with PB3 (that I outlined in a previous review) and a brief detour on BB2, I am once again craving strength and jacked gainz. I loved PB3 so much, and it improved my bench press farther than anything ever in ~10 years of training. Now, my OHP is by far my weakest lift, and I’d like to put in the work to get that to 185# or so.” -Connor
“Just finished week 8 of phase 2 of the beginner template and absolutely crushed it! After many (many) weeks of stagnation and minimal gains (phase 2 @9 and extra volume was really a struggle at first) I added an easy 10 to my deadlift and an easy 5 to my press in one session and still probably had a bit more in the tank. I hear you guys talk about these types of days all the time but this is honestly the first time I’ve experienced one. It finally feels like training is working for me. Like a drug high though, I feel I’ll be chasing this particular feeling now for the rest of my training career, which I suppose isn’t a bad thing as long as I manage my expectations.” –wiigelec
“My knee pain got substantially better thanks to knee rehab template.” –whoops
“I’m 12 weeks into the PB3 template and have been enjoying it so far, increasing my maxes by around 5-15%.” –Tom B.
“I have run this program multiple times now and have had great results.” –Saint Perre
What are Training Programs?
Our Programs provide exercises to perform to best reach your goals. They offer specific or choices of exercises, programming for number of days of the week to exercise, sets and repetitions, and other details so that you’re armed with all that you need when you exercise. They also take into account the amount of experience you have and your preferences, such as how many days per week you have available to train.
What is the difference between Program categories?
The Endurance category is focused on conditioning and developing your overall fitness. Hypertrophy has a primary focus on building muscle size. Rehab is for those suffering from specific body part injuries that they would like to address with a tailored exercise program to return to full function. And, finally, Strength is focused on developing strength as the main goal above all others and perfectly suited for those casually or competitively engaged in weightlifting.
How are the Programs delivered and used?
You have a choice of how you’d like to use each Training Program based on your preferences. Each Program can be downloaded individual files, such as spreadsheets and PDF eBooks that contain instructions and all of the programming for your training sessions. We also have a Barbell Medicine mobile app (available for both Apple iOS & Google Android devices) that you can use instead that guides your training sessions directly in-App.
What else is provided with the Programs?
We offer lifetime support and bug fixes for each of our Programs. If you have questions or issues with the material, you can contact us in our Forum and we will be glad to provide you support.
What is your Return Policy for Programs?
Because of the electronic nature of our product and to protect our intellectual property, we do not offer any refunds or returns on Program purchases.
Who are Programs a good fit for?
We consider our Programs a great Do-It-Yourself (DIY) approach for getting high-quality programing for your goals & preferences at an unbeatable price. We recognize that some either don’t have the time and energy to use a Program or just prefer the expert advice & guidance that comes from 1-on-1 Coaching. For those situations, we offer a comprehensive 1-on-1 Coaching service and we would be glad to work with you.
Strength training, also known as resistance training, is a type of exercise where the muscles of the body create force via contraction against a load or weight. The load or weight may be external or internal to the individual, e.g. barbell (external) or body-weight (internal) exercises.
Strength is defined as the amount of force produced measured in a specific context. For example, a powerlifter completing a heavy 1-Rep-Maximum (1RM) squat is displaying force production in one context (e.g. a maximal, single-effort squat) whereas a gymnast or shot-put thrower is displaying force production in a different context. In sum, there are many different types of strength that are linked together by the common feature of muscular force production.
All of what we mentioned so far are the basics of strength training. But what’s the science behind it? There are a few biological phenomena that occur as our bodies build strength. Let’s find out what those are.
For strength training to work, multiple, complex adaptations must occur across many tissues including the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, muscle, tendons, and bones.
It all starts with muscular contraction, where the muscle produces enough force to overcome the resistance and move it through the desired range of motion. In order to generate enough force to lift the weight, the brain sends a signal to the muscles to contract, which results in muscle fibers shortening through actin-myosin crossbridge production.
The actin-myosin crossbridges are at the core of muscle contractions and, by sliding past each other, allow us to produce the force necessary to (hopefully) overcome the resistance. As its name suggests, an actin-myosin crossbridge is a compound of two proteins; actin and myosin.
When a muscle is activated by the signal from the brain, the proteins in these filaments react with each other, creating crossbridges. [14] To improve strength performance we need to improve muscular force production. To do that, we need to form more crossbridges in a coordinated way and have them transfer force more efficiently to the bones to cause movement.
From a muscle loading perspective, we need to make sure we use enough weight so that the muscles are required to produce high amounts of force in an efficient manner. We know that heavier loads (e.g. higher intensity) does this better than low loads. [5] This is somewhere around the 60 to 70% of someone’s 1-Repetition Maximum (1RM), though even heavier loads (> 90% 1RM) should be used to improve maximal strength. [15]
Repetitions that are too light do not require the muscles to form more crossbridges in an efficient way. But with the appropriate amount of resistance, muscle contractions will occur in a manner that builds strength over time.
Another factor that allows our bodies to build strength is muscle fiber recruitment, which is the phenomenon that occurs when our nervous system recruits motor units.
Motor units consist of a single motor neuron and all of the muscle fibers they activate. All muscle groups contain motor units that come in a variety of sizes, and the smaller motor units are always activated first. As the mechanical load increases, the movement starts demanding more force, which is when bigger motor units are activated. This is referred to as Henneman’s size principle.
While it may seem logical that heavier loads require more motor unit recruitment than lighter loads, recent evidence suggests that during dynamic movements, most motor units are recruited similarly during both light (<50% 1RM) and heavy (>85%) efforts. [16] For example, one study showed that there was similar activation of the quad muscles when doing single repetitions at loads ranging from 50% to 90% of a 1RM squat. [17] Rather, the major difference between lighter and heavier efforts does not appear to be the amount of muscle mass used, but rather how frequently they get the signal to contract, which is known as rate coding. [16]
When the muscle is continually trained, the nervous system sends the signal to the motor units to contract more frequently, which both recruits more motor units total and increases the force each one produces. This allows the muscle to react better to increasing mechanical loads through a process called neuromuscular adaptation.
Lifting weights at challenging loads generates a strong signal within the muscle to make more muscle, a process called muscle protein synthesis. Increases in muscle protein synthesis rates are helpful in repairing the muscle protein breakdown that occurs with resistance training. When more muscle protein is being synthesized than broken down, muscle size increases, which is called muscle hypertrophy.
In humans, muscle size can change by altering the number of muscle fibers or the size of existing muscle fibers. [18] Increasing the number of muscle fibers is termed hyperplasia, whereas an increase or decrease in the size of existing muscle fibers is called hypertrophy or atrophy, respectively. At present, hyperplasia has not yet been demonstrated in adults, rather changes in muscle size over a lifetime appears to be the result of hypertrophy and atrophy. [18, 19]
While some believe that muscle protein breakdown from lifting weights is key to causing the muscle to grow, the scientific evidence shows that very little muscle growth takes place when levels of muscle protein breakdown are high. Instead, muscle growth seems to mostly happen when relatively little muscle protein breakdown occurs from training. [20] Reduced levels of muscle protein breakdown from exercise occur if the program is well-suited to the individual’s, e.g. not too much or not too little stress, and as they get used to the demands of the program.[21]
All of these phenomena play into the strengthening of the muscle. However, there is a specific set of factors that a training program must have to help lifters achieve the maximum amount of strength. We’ll now look into a few of them.
Strength training is heavily reliant on consistently challenging the body with a training load that matches the individual’s current fitness level, goals, and resources. The responses to training are heavily influenced by genetics, but not so much by age or sex based on current evidence. For example, one study looked at how men and women ages 19 to 78 responded to the same 6-month lifting program. Some people got a lot stronger, improving their strength by 60%, while some others actually lost strength (-8%) when following the same program. The response to the training programs varied independently of the sex or age of the subjects. [4]
Individuals respond uniquely to exercise, which is why applying the same programs to everyone would be unreasonable at best and detrimental at worst. If you are considering a strength training program, it’s essential that you get help from a licensed professional first — but more on that later.
We’ve mentioned that building strength requires continually challenging our muscles, and this is achieved through what we call progressive loading. In other words, as people get stronger, the weight or reps completed must increase to match this improvement so that all the biological phenomena are signaled to improve strength.
While challenging the muscle is crucial to building strength, we can’t force strength gains to occur. Rather, the weight we lift week-to-week should track with an individual’s performance potential. On days where someone is feeling strong, adding weight is likely the right call in order to match their current uptick in performance. On days where someone is not performing as well, reducing the load would be the move in order to match their current performance potential. We call this autoregulation.
In addition to matching the training to what the individual needs based on real-time feedback, there are a few techniques that can help with recovery and adaptation rates.
Here are some that can help us get back on our feet in a shorter period:
Remember, building strength doesn’t happen overnight, and can only be achieved through continually putting the right amount of stress on our muscles and allowing them to adapt over time. For individuals who are new to the world of strength training, or who don’t have the necessary amount of knowledge to create the perfect program, this can be a lot to handle.
This is why we stress how crucial it is to get help from licensed professionals. So, this brings us to our next point— how can Barbell Medicine assist you in your strength training journey?
Ready to start your strength journey? Use our Program Quiz to find your program:
Obviously, enhancing our physical strength is a massive benefit on its own, but the advantages of following a strength training program don’t stop there. Strength training has the potential to offer a variety of physical and mental health benefits
This is the area that strength training specifically targets, and as so it is the area in which an individual will experience the most benefit. However, when we think of muscle strength, we shouldn’t only consider a muscle group’s ability to create maximal force in the gym. In fact, strength training has proven to improve power, endurance, and speed as well, in accordance with muscle adaptation and development. [24,25]
Participation in strength training has long been associated with lowering the risk of many health issues such as type II diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. [3] It also appears that individuals who get stronger seem to have greater improvements in health compared to those who still lift, but don’t get as strong. [26,27]
While a strength-focused training program is unlikely to increase muscle size as much as a hypertrophy-focused program, strength training does drive large improvements in muscle size when programmed appropriately, especially in someone new to lifting.
Strength training can improve cardiorespiratory fitness in those with lower levels of aerobic capacity, as well as improve performance in endurance-based sports. [25,28] Getting stronger also lowers resting blood pressure and blood cholesterol levels, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Strength training can strengthen bones and promote bone growth, which is crucial for individuals who are at risk of osteoporosis, such as menopausal women. [29]
It is well-known that strength training increases muscle mass, reduces risk of weight regain, and tends to reduce waist circumference by reducing abdominal fat. [35] Exercise training also appears to increase many individuals’ sensitivity to feelings of fullness when eating, thereby potentially helping with weight maintenance or loss. [36]
Osteoarthritis is one of the most common disabling conditions related to joint pain. It most often affects the knees, hips, and hands of middle-aged and older individuals.
Strength training tends to produce clinically significant improvements in muscle strength, functional ability, and pain scores, even in patients with advanced disease [33] Additionally, starting to lift earlier seems to not only reduce loss of strength associated with osteoarthritis, but also slows down or even stops progression of the disease. [34]
Regular strength training has been proven to reduce the risks or symptoms of some mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety. These effects seem to occur regardless if the individuals actually get stronger, but rather a different mechanism that’s currently unknown. [30, 31]
Strength training has also been proven to improve sleep quality in individuals, which is a huge plus, as getting enough sleep is pivotal to having good mental health. [32]
Anyone could benefit from becoming stronger. One obvious advantage would be the ability to perform daily tasks, such as carrying heavy objects or opening stubborn jar lids easily (which is a total flex, in our opinion).
But jokes aside, strength training hosts a myriad of benefits for all groups of people, regardless of age, sex, and fitness level. From helping individuals with mood stability issues or anxiety to allowing us to age better, strength training is an enjoyable and healthy solution to many health issues.
We’d also like to stress that although strength training has historically been perceived as a masculine sport, women can benefit from strength training even more than men, as it reduces the risk of skeletal problems such as osteoporosis, which many women face as they get older.
So, there are really no who’s and how’s when it comes to starting strength training, but only when’s. And our answer to that is, what better time than now?
Ready to start your strength journey? Use our Program Quiz to find your program:
1. Huber, Machteld et al. “How should we define health?.” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) vol. 343 d4163. 26 Jul. 2011, doi:10.1136/bmj.d4163
2. Caspersen, C J et al. “Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research.” Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) vol. 100,2 (1985): 126-31.
3. Sullivan, J., Feigenbaum, J., & Baraki, A. (2023). Strength training for health in adults: Terminology, principles, benefits, and risks. In: UpToDate. Grayzel J (Ed). Available from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/strength-training-for-health-in-adults-terminology-principles-benefits-and-risks
4. Ahtiainen, Juha P et al. “Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages.” Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) vol. 38,1 (2016): 10. doi:10.1007/s11357-015-9870-1
5. Schoenfeld, Brad J et al. “Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Journal of strength and conditioning research vol. 31,12 (2017): 3508-3523. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002200
6. Figueiredo, Vandré Casagrande et al. “Volume for Muscle Hypertrophy and Health Outcomes: The Most Effective Variable in Resistance Training.” Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) vol. 48,3 (2018): 499-505. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0793-0
7. Ralston, Grant W et al. “The Effect of Weekly Set Volume on Strength Gain: A Meta-Analysis.” Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) vol. 47,12 (2017): 2585-2601. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0762-7
8. Morán-Navarro, Ricardo et al. “Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure.” European journal of applied physiology vol. 117,12 (2017): 2387-2399. doi:10.1007/s00421-017-3725-7
9. Santos, Wanderson Divino Nilo Dos et al. “Resistance Training Performed to Failure or Not to Failure Results in Similar Total Volume, but With Different Fatigue and Discomfort Levels.” Journal of strength and conditioning research vol. 35,5 (2021): 1372-1379. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000002915
10. Pareja-Blanco, Fernando et al. “Effects of Velocity Loss During Resistance Training on Performance in Professional Soccer Players.” International journal of sports physiology and performance vol. 12,4 (2017): 512-519. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0170
11. Pareja-Blanco, F et al. “Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations.” Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports vol. 27,7 (2017): 724-735. doi:10.1111/sms.12678
12. Carroll, Kevin M et al. “Skeletal Muscle Fiber Adaptations Following Resistance Training Using Repetition Maximums or Relative Intensity.” Sports (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 7,7 169. 11 Jul. 2019, doi:10.3390/sports7070169
13. Helms, Eric R et al. “RPE vs. Percentage 1RM Loading in Periodized Programs Matched for Sets and Repetitions.” Frontiers in physiology vol. 9 247. 21 Mar. 2018, doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00247
14. Gash MC, Kandle PF, Murray IV, et al. Physiology, Muscle Contraction. [Updated 2023 Apr 1]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537140/
15. Androulakis-Korakakis, Patroklos et al. “Reduced Volume ‘Daily Max’ Training Compared to Higher Volume Periodized Training in Powerlifters Preparing for Competition-A Pilot Study.” Sports (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 6,3 86. 29 Aug. 2018, doi:10.3390/sports6030086
16. Potvin, Jim R, and Andrew J Fuglevand. “A motor unit-based model of muscle fatigue.” PLoS computational biology vol. 13,6 e1005581. 2 Jun. 2017, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005581
17. van den Tillaar, Roland et al. “Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads.” PloS one vol. 14,5 e0217044. 16 May. 2019, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217044
18. Pearson AM. Muscle growth and exercise. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1990;29(3):167-96. doi: 10.1080/10408399009527522. PMID: 2222798.
19. Murach KA, Dungan CM, Peterson CA, McCarthy JJ. Muscle Fiber Splitting Is a Physiological Response to Extreme Loading in Animals. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019 Apr;47(2):108-115. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000181. PMID: 30640746; PMCID: PMC6422761.
20. Biressi S, Molinaro M, Cossu G. Cellular heterogeneity during vertebrate skeletal muscle development. Dev Biol. 2007 Aug 15;308(2):281-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Jun 13. PMID: 17612520.
21. Damas F, Libardi CA, Ugrinowitsch C. The development of skeletal muscle hypertrophy through resistance training: the role of muscle damage and muscle protein synthesis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Mar;118(3):485-500. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9. Epub 2017 Dec 27. PMID: 29282529.
22. McHugh MP. Recent advances in the understanding of the repeated bout effect: the protective effect against muscle damage from a single bout of eccentric exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003 Apr;13(2):88-97. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.02477.x. PMID: 12641640.
23. Cunha LA, Costa JA, Marques EA, Brito J, Lastella M, Figueiredo P. The Impact of Sleep Interventions on Athletic Performance: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Open. 2023 Jul 18;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00599-z. PMID: 37462808; PMCID: PMC10354314.
24. Andersen V, Prieske O, Stien N, Cumming K, Solstad TEJ, Paulsen G, van den Tillaar R, Pedersen H, Saeterbakken AH. Comparing the effects of variable and traditional resistance training on maximal strength and muscle power in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Dec;25(12):1023-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2022.08.009. Epub 2022 Aug 28. PMID: 36130847.
25. Balabinis CP, Psarakis CH, Moukas M, Vassiliou MP, Behrakis PK. Early phase changes by concurrent endurance and strength training. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 May;17(2):393-401. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0393:epcbce>2.0.co;2. PMID: 12741884.
26. Igarashi, Yutaka. Effects of Differences in Exercise Programs With Regular Resistance Training on Resting Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 37(1):p 253-263, January 2023. | DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004236
27. Jansson AK, Chan LX, Lubans DR, Duncan MJ, Plotnikoff RC. Effect of resistance training on HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the moderating effect of changes in muscular strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Mar;10(2):e002595. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002595. PMID: 35273011; PMCID: PMC8915309.
28. Ozaki, H., Loenneke, J.P., Thiebaud, R.S. et al. Resistance training induced increase in VO2max in young and older subjects. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 10, 107–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11556-013-0120-1
29. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Harding AT, Horan SA, Beck BR. High-Intensity Resistance and Impact Training Improves Bone Mineral Density and Physical Function in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: The LIFTMOR Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):211-220. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3284. Epub 2017 Oct 4. Erratum in: J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Mar;34(3):572. PMID: 28975661.
30. Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Lyons M, Herring MP. The Effects of Resistance Exercise Training on Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sports Med. 2017 Dec;47(12):2521-2532. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0769-0. PMID: 28819746.
31. Gordon BR, McDowell CP, Hallgren M, Meyer JD, Lyons M, Herring MP. Association of Efficacy of Resistance Exercise Training With Depressive Symptoms: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):566-576. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572. PMID: 29800984; PMCID: PMC6137526.
32. Kovacevic A, Mavros Y, Heisz JJ, Fiatarone Singh MA. The effect of resistance exercise on sleep: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med Rev. 2018 Jun;39:52-68. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PMID: 28919335.
33. Turner MN, Hernandez DO, Cade W, Emerson CP, Reynolds JM, Best TM. The Role of Resistance Training Dosing on Pain and Physical Function in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Sports Health. 2020 Mar/Apr;12(2):200-206. doi: 10.1177/1941738119887183. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PMID: 31850826; PMCID: PMC7040944.
34. Kristensen J, Franklyn-Miller A. Resistance training in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;46(10):719-26. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079376. Epub 2011 Jul 26. PMID: 21791457.
35. O’Donoghue, G, Blake, C, Cunningham, C, Lennon, O, Perrotta, C. What exercise prescription is optimal to improve body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with obesity? A network meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2021; 22:e13137. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13137
36. Hopkins, Marka,b; King, Neil Ac; Blundell, John Ea. Acute and long-term effects of exercise on appetite control: is there any benefit for weight control?. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 13(6):p 635-640, November 2010. | DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833e343b